• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH MODULAR DUAL MOBILITY INSERT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH MODULAR DUAL MOBILITY INSERT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 626-00-46F
Device Problems Corroded (1131); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Pain (1994); Osteolysis (2377); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Fibrosis (3167); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Date 07/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Patient left voicemail on patient hotline reporting a revision due to pain and "corroded metal on metal" with his right stryker dual mobility hip.Update: metallosis, osteolysis.My bone was decomposing.I had to have the hip revised.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.H3 other text : not returned to the manufacturer.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding corrosion involving an mdm liner was reported.The event was confirmed via the provided photographs of the device.Method & results: product evaluation and results: the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show the surface of the distal surface of the mdm liner.Damage can be seen on the outer spherical surface of the mdm metal liner near the rim.This damage appears consistent with the interaction between the mdm metal liner and the shell.Black debris is observed on the mating surfaces.The appearance of the debris is consistent with a corrosion product and material transfer from the shell/biological material.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "this case concerns a 51-year-old gentleman who underwent a primary right total arthroplasty using cementless implants and an mdm articulation.Approximately 18 months after implantation, the patient had to be revised for increasing pain and what sounds like metallosis.Although most likely metallosis could come from the trunnion articulation, i have no information regarding the etiology.I can confirm that the patient had a primary total hip arthroplasty with the above components since i was able to review the operation report.I cannot confirm the revision or what was found at the revision since i only have a notation of explantation in the product summary.The root cause of this patient's early total hip arthroplasty failure due to trunnionosis and metallosis cannot be determined with certainty.The causes of trunnionosis and metallosis are multifactorial.They include surgical technique factors, patient factors such as activity level, lifestyle and bmi, and possible implant factors." product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to pain and "corroded metal on metal".The reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show the surface of the distal surface of the mdm liner.Damage can be seen on the outer spherical surface of the mdm metal liner near the rim.This damage appears consistent with the interaction between the mdm metal liner and the shell.Black debris is observed on the mating surfaces.The appearance of the debris is consistent with a corrosion product and material transfer from the shell/biological material.A review of the provided medical records was unable to confirm the event or determine the etiology of the potential metallosis.Further information such as pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Patient left voicemail on patient hotline reporting a revision due to pain and "corroded metal on metal" with his right stryker dual mobility hip.Update: ".Metallosis, osteolysis.My bone was decomposing.I had to have the hip revised.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding corrosion involving an mdm liner was reported.The event was confirmed via the provided photographs of the device and clinician review of the provided medical records.Method & results: product evaluation and results: the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show the surface of the distal surface of the mdm liner.Damage can be seen on the outer spherical surface of the mdm metal liner near the rim.This damage appears consistent with the interaction between the mdm metal liner and the shell.Black debris is observed on the mating surfaces.The appearance of the debris is consistent with a corrosion product and material transfer from the shell/biological material.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "this case concerns a 51-year-old gentleman who underwent a primary right total arthroplasty using cementless implants and an mdm articulation.Approximately 18 months after implantation, the patient had to be revised for increasing pain and what sounds like metallosis.Although most likely metallosis could come from the trunnion articulation, i have no information regarding the etiology.I can confirm that the patient had a primary total hip arthroplasty with the above components since i was able to review the operation report.I cannot confirm the revision or what was found at the revision since i only have a notation of explantation in the product summary.However, based upon the new information provided for this second addendum, i can confirm that the revision procedure took place, and that findings included metallosis between the acetabular cup and the mdm metal liner.The root cause of this patient's early total hip arthroplasty failure due metallosis cannot be determined with certainty.The causes of metallosis are multifactorial.They include surgical technique factors, especially in the preparation and proper implantation of the mdm liner into the acetabular cup.No special mention was made of any particular preparation.Patient factors such as activity level, lifestyle and bmi, and possible implant factors may also be contributory.I am also concerned that there was no specific mention of the preparation of the trunnion for implantation of the femoral head.In my experience corrosion beneath a ceramic head can happen but it is exceedingly rare." product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to pain and "corroded metal on metal".The reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show the surface of the distal surface of the mdm liner.Damage can be seen on the outer spherical surface of the mdm metal liner near the rim.This damage appears consistent with the interaction between the mdm metal liner and the shell.Black debris is observed on the mating surfaces.The appearance of the debris is consistent with a corrosion product and material transfer from the shell/biological material.A review of the provided medical records also confirmed the event and indicated the following: "the causes of metallosis are multifactorial.They include surgical technique factors, especially in the preparation and proper implantation of the mdm liner into the acetabular cup.No special mention was made of any particular preparation.Patient factors such as activity level, lifestyle and bmi, and possible implant factors may also be contributory." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Patient left voicemail on patient hotline reporting a revision due to pain and "corroded metal on metal" with his right stryker dual mobility hip.Update: "metallosis, osteolysis.My bone was decomposing.I had to have the hip revised.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MODULAR DUAL MOBILITY INSERT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NJ NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick, NJ NA
EI   NA
2018315000
MDR Report Key17486127
MDR Text Key320651281
Report Number0002249697-2023-00881
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K103233
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/06/2024
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/09/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number626-00-46F
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight91 KG
-
-