• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK UROLOGICAL INC OPEN-END URETERAL CATHETER; GBL CATHETER, URETERAL, GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK UROLOGICAL INC OPEN-END URETERAL CATHETER; GBL CATHETER, URETERAL, GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 020014
Device Problem Flaked (1246)
Patient Problem Foreign body, removal of (2365)
Event Date 03/06/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Doctor and registered nurse both said they noticed the catheter peeling off pieces when inside the pt.He went in and retrieved the pieces that broke off.Additional information received (b)(4) 2014 - the cystoscopy with retrograde studies were done at the start of the case on a 7 month old child.The 4fr ureteral open ended catheter by cook was used then.They used a wolfe 9.6fr offset pediatric lens for the case that accepts up to 5fr in the channel.A.025 glidewire was used by boston scientific.A disposable alligator forcep by cook was utilized to remove the particles found int he bladder.The case proceeded and was completed as noted by the above procedure.Pt is currently doing fine, recovering.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Event evaluation: still under investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During the investigation, a review of complaint history, drawing, quality control and a dimension verification and visual inspection of the returned device were conducted.One used device was received and visually inspected to find scrape marks starting approximately 45cm from the distal tip and concluding less than 1cm from the distal tip.Included with the device were shavings that were scraped off the side of the catheter.The customer stated "they noticed the catheter peeling off pieces when inside the patient.He went in and retrieved the pieces that broke off." the device had obviously been damaged by an instrument of undetermined origin.As the user pulled or pushed the device past a sharp portion of the instrument, the catheter scraped against it and created shavings.There is no evidence to suggest product was not manufactured to specifications.Quality engineering risk assessment was used to assess the risk of this complaint.Per conclusion, no further risk reduction is required.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
 
Event Description
Doctor and rn both said they noticed the catheter peeling off pieces when inside the patient.He went in and retrieved the pieces that broke off.Additional information received march 13, 2014, the cystoscopy with retrograde studies were done at the start of the case on a (b)(6) child.The 4fr ureteral open ended catheter by cook was used then.They used a wolfe 9 6fr offset pediatric lens for the case that accepts up to 5fr in the channel a 025 glidewire was used by boston scientific.A disposable alligator forcep by cook was utilized to remove the particles found in the bladder.The case proceeded and was completed as noted by the above procedure.Patient is currently doing fine, recovering.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPEN-END URETERAL CATHETER
Type of Device
GBL CATHETER, URETERAL, GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK UROLOGICAL INC
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool, manager
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key3736002
MDR Text Key17157237
Report Number1820334-2014-00143
Device Sequence Number0
Product Code GBL
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/07/2014
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2015
Device Catalogue Number020014
Device Lot NumberU2293083
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/18/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date03/06/2014
Device Age2 MO
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received03/12/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/08/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age7 MO
-
-