• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MALEM MEDICAL UK MALEM MEDICAL; ALARM, CONDITIONED RESPONSE ENURESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MALEM MEDICAL UK MALEM MEDICAL; ALARM, CONDITIONED RESPONSE ENURESIS Back to Search Results
Device Problems Overheating of Device (1437); Defective Component (2292)
Patient Problem Superficial (First Degree) Burn (2685)
Event Date 09/04/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Parents of a (b)(6) have reported a malfunction and defect with an enuresis alarm their daughter was using.The enuresis alarm burnt the child's chest and she had to be treated for first degree burns.Alarm has been returned back to parents and child has been advised to discontinue using device and take precaution.This is the second incident we have seen in this year related to this brand of enuresis alarm where a child got burnt.In both cases, the alarm had overheated and burnt the child where it made contact with skin.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MALEM MEDICAL
Type of Device
ALARM, CONDITIONED RESPONSE ENURESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MALEM MEDICAL UK
lowdham, nottingham
UK 
MDR Report Key7859612
MDR Text Key119788934
Report NumberMW5079659
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KPN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCO
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/06/2018
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/07/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age12 YR
Patient Weight43
-
-