• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CLARITY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. RETCAM 3; OPHTHALMIC CAMERA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CLARITY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. RETCAM 3; OPHTHALMIC CAMERA Back to Search Results
Model Number RETCAM 3
Device Problem Date/Time-Related Software Problem (2582)
Patient Problem Not Applicable (3189)
Event Date 01/02/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
When the doctor (located in (b)(6)) was creating a new patient record in the retcam system, she noticed that the calculated age of the patient appeared wrong.Patient was not injured.Patient age is calculated at the time of retcam use based on patient's date of birth.Patient age is provided for reference information only.Physicians do not typically rely on retcam calculated age to determine start of screening and/or follow up examinations for monitoring retinopathy of prematurity (rop).In this case, the doctor was not using the retcam displayed age to determine the date for initial or follow up rop screening.However, in the very unlikely scenario that a medical professional relies on the age of the patient as displayed on the retcam system for initiation of screening, he might start rop screening later than recommended (up to 2 weeks in the worst case).Failure to timely screen and proactively treat (if deemed medically necessary) might result in permanent impairment of vision.Note that there have been no previous reports of this issue to date.This software is installed on over (b)(4) devices/been in field for 2 yrs.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Clarity was able to duplicate the issue using devices in-house with a similar software configuration; software version 6.2.The retcam ophthalmic imaging system calculates age which is displayed on the retcam system computer monitor in days, weeks, and/or months.The error occurs only in the "weeks" value.Internal tests show that if the patient is born november 1 to december 31, the patient's displayed age may appear as much as 2 weeks less than the actual age.For all other patient's (born january 1 to october 31), the patient's displayed age may appear as much as 1 week less than the actual age.The root cause of the problem is a software anomaly in software versions 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2.Clarity currently intends to issue a user safety letter followed by provision of a software patch.Clarity risk analysis based upon typical hospital work flow and post market information indicates that an injury due to this software anomaly is improbable to remote.Hospitals typically use hospital erm systems to determine patient age.There are over (b)(4) devices in the field with this anomaly.Initial distribution of retcam version 6 devices began in november 2011.This is the first and only report clarity has received regarding this software anomaly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RETCAM 3
Type of Device
OPHTHALMIC CAMERA
Manufacturer (Section D)
CLARITY MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer Contact
gary seeger
5775 west las positas blvd.
pleasanton, CA 94588
MDR Report Key3670061
MDR Text Key4343058
Report Number2952489-2014-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HKI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K090326
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Notification
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/22/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/22/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRETCAM 3
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/02/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age14 DA
Patient Weight2
-
-