The customer reports three patients who underwent unspecified procedures using one of two different gastroscopes tested positive for a rare strain of antibiotic resistant e.Coli.The customer is unsure if the patients were cross infected with the scopes.Additional details regarding the patients and reported events have been requested.At this time, the only additional provided by the customer was that the scopes have been cultured by the facility.The cultures on both scopes have all come back negative, however, the scopes will be sent in for routine maintenance.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient one of three.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient two of three.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient three of three.
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation and device evaluation.The device was returned to olympus for inspection, and the following non-reportable defects were observed: leakage from biopsy channel, switch button 1 (sw1) shifted, inner wall of biopsy channel scraped/cracked, insufficient angulation, play on up/down angulation control knob, insertion section sneaky at manipulation, objective lens (ob-lens) glue deteriorated, light guide (lg-lens) glue deteriorated, water invasion of 1 lens, bending section cover (a-rubber) glue discolored/cracked, universal cord under boot wrinkled, labeling at control section was wet, and inner control section/cover corroded.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 5 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, a root cause of the reported event could not be determined.The olympus endoscopy support specialist (ess) confirmed that after observing the customer's reprocessing steps of the device, there were no deviations from the instructions for use (ifu).The user also confirmed that after performing culture testing of the device, the results were negative.Therefore, a relationship between the reported patient infection and the subject device could not be identified.This supplemental report includes a correction to d9 to provide information that was inadvertently not included on the initial medwatch.An update has been made to h3.Also, additional information has been added to d8 and h4.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|