• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. HINODE PLANT SINGLE USE DISTAL COVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. HINODE PLANT SINGLE USE DISTAL COVER Back to Search Results
Model Number MAJ-2315
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem Laceration(s) of Esophagus (2398)
Event Date 12/15/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The customer reports during an unspecified procedure using an evis exera iii duodenovideoscope and a single use distal cover, the patient experienced a 15cm esophageal tear with no perforation.The physician aborted the case.Additional details regarding the patient and reproted event have been requested.At this time, no additional information has been provided.Case with patient identifier: (b)(6) reports the scope used in the procedure.Case with patient identifier: (b)(6) reports the single use distal cover used in the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction and preventative action (capa) investigation has been opened to further investigate this issue.The device referenced in this report was not returned to olympus for evaluation.The definitive cause of the user's experience cannot be determined at this time.The investigation is ongoing.This report will be updated upon completion of the investigation or upon receipt of additional relevant information.This event has been reported by the importer on mdr#: 2429304-2023-00004.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been less than 1 year since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, removing the endoscope while the end of the device is pressed against the mucous membrane by aspiration, may cause damage to the mucous membrane or collection of tissue fragments.This is applicable even if the distal cover after the design change was used, however, it was confirmed that the tissue invasiveness is less than that of the tip cover before the design change.Furthermore, per capa no.Omsc-hq-153-19, the mechanism of occurrence of this event has been found to be as follows: procedure is started without noticing cracks in the tip cover during pre-use inspection.By performing the suction operation with the tip in close contact with the mucous membrane, the mucous membrane enters between the tip cover and the elevator.The endoscope was removed with the mucous membrane inserted between the tip cover and the elevator (the tip was adsorbed on the mucous membrane).The mucous membrane that has entered at the cracked part of the tip cover is excised, and a piece of mucous membrane remains in the tip cover.Procedure is started without noticing cracks in the tip cover during pre-use inspection.Although no suction operation is performed, the mucous membrane enters between the tip cover and the elevator due to the strong contact between the tip and the mucous membrane.The endoscope is removed with the mucous membrane inserted between the tip cover and the elevator (the tip is in strong contact with the mucous membrane).The mucous membrane that has entered at the cracked part of the tip cover is excised, and a piece of mucous membrane remains in the tip cover.By performing the suction operation with the tip in close contact with the mucous membrane, the mucous membrane enters between the tip cover and the elevator.The endoscope was removed with the mucous membrane inserted between the tip cover and the elevator (the tip was adsorbed on the mucous membrane).The mucous membrane that has entered at the edge of the tip cover (around the u-shaped slit) is excised, and a piece of mucosa remains in the tip cover.The root cause has been identified as follows from the mechanism of occurrence: root cause 1: start the inspection without confirming that the tip cover is properly attached during the pre-use inspection (start the inspection with the tip cover cracked).Root cause 2: removing the endoscope with the tip adsorbed on the mucous membrane by suction operation.The event can be detected/prevented by following the instructions for use (ifu) which state: ¿withdrawal of the endoscope: take caution applying suction when the distal end is in contact with the mucosal surface.The suction can cause the distal end to aspirate the mucosal membrane.Moving or withdrawing the endoscope under this condition may cause patient injury and/or bleeding.This can be more common while degassing in the stomach, suctioning debris, and operating in a narrow lumen (e.G., esophagus, duodenum).To prevent patient injury and bleeding, make sure to: only apply suction when the endoscope is stationary.After releasing the suction valve, check the endoscopic image to confirm that the mucosal membrane is not aspirated before moving the endoscope.Releasing the suction valve might not immediately release the mucosal membrane if it becomes aspirated.¿ this supplemental report includes information added to h4.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to correct d4 - unique identifier (udi) number to (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE DISTAL COVER
Type of Device
DISTAL COVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. HINODE PLANT
34-3 hirai, hinode-machi
nishitama-gun, tokyo 190-0 182
JA  190-0182
Manufacturer (Section G)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. HINODE PLANT
34-3 hirai, hinode-machi
nishitama-gun, tokyo
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key16156372
MDR Text Key307262651
Report Number3003637092-2023-00009
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K220587
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMAJ-2315
Device Lot NumberH2623
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/29/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/23/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberZ-1292-2021
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
TJF-Q190V.
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-