• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC VARIPULSE¿ BI-DIRECTIONAL CATHETER; PERCUTANEOUS CARDIAC ABL CATH FOR TREATMT OF AFIB W IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC VARIPULSE¿ BI-DIRECTIONAL CATHETER; PERCUTANEOUS CARDIAC ABL CATH FOR TREATMT OF AFIB W IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number D141201
Medical Device Problem Code Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Stroke/CVA (1770)
Date of Event 03/03/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
During cardiac ablation procedure with a varipulse/qdot catheter, the patient experienced stroke/cerebral infarct.The report indicated during a cti (cavo tricuspid isthmus) line was done with qdot micro catheter, followed by atrial fibrillation ablation with the varipulse catheter.Before any ablation with the varipulse occurred, an error occurred on the pump when the varipulse was in the left atrium.The physiologist accidentally flushed the catheter before the flow was closed to the patient for approximately 1 second.The doctor then took the catheter out and the medical team flushed outside of the body.Everything else about the procedure was normal.Act (activated clotting time) was above 350 before ablation as stated in varipulse ifu (instructions for use).28 lesions were done including posterior wall.The product was not used in a clinical trial.The stroke/cerebral infarct event was discovered when the patient was waking up from general anesthesia.The surgery was not prolonged due to the event.Two reports have been submitted for this event, one for the varipulse and one for the qdot.This report is for the varipulse.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.An evaluation of the manufacturing record could not be performed as the required product identification number was not provided to complete the evaluation.It was confirmed that ablation was performed outside pulmonary veins.The use of the varipulse¿ ablation catheter for ablations beyond pulmonary vein isolation may be linked to the higher-than-anticipated incidence of peri-procedural stroke or tia (trans ischemic accident).In 70% of the cases of stroke or tia reported to bwi world-wide, patients received ablations outside the pulmonary veins.The safety and effective use of this device outside of the pulmonary veins for the treatment of atrial fibrillation has not been clinically established and may increase the risk of patient injury.An internal action is being followed to investigate neurovascular events with varipulse catheters.Importantly, the mechanism for an incidence of stroke is multi-factorial.The investigation also concluded that the risk of neurovascular events may increase if a high number of ablations, stacking of ablations and/or ablation outside of the pulmonary veins are delivered.The ifus (instructions for use) are instructions that provide detailed guidance on how safely and effectively use a medical device.It is the physician¿s responsibility to review the patient¿s medical history and make the best-informed decision based on all available information.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster, inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster, inc.Or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
On 7-apr-2026, the bwi product analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The product investigation was subsequently completed.During cardiac ablation procedure with a varipulse/qdot catheter, the patient experienced stroke/cerebral infarct.The report indicated during a cti (cavo tricuspid isthmus) line was done with qdot micro catheter, followed by atrial fibrillation ablation with the varipulse catheter.Before any ablation with the varipulse occurred, an error occurred on the pump when the varipulse was in the left atrium.The physiologist accidentally flushed the catheter before the flow was closed to the patient for approximately 1 second.The doctor then took the catheter out and the medical team flushed outside of the body.Everything else about the procedure was normal.Act (activated clotting time) was above 350 before ablation as stated in varipulse ifu (instructions for use).28 lesions were done including posterior wall.The product was not used in a clinical trial.The stroke/cerebral infarct event was discovered when the patient was waking up from general anesthesia.The surgery was not prolonged due to the event.Device evaluation details: the device was returned to johnson & johnson medtech (j&j medtech) for evaluation.Following j&j medtech procedures, a visual inspection and revision of all device features were performed.Visual inspection revealed no damage or anomalies on the device.The device was connected to carto 3 system and trupulse generator and it was recognized and visualized correctly, no magnetic or noise issues were found.Device was deflected and irrigated during the test and no issues were found.A pulse field ablation (pfa) test was performed and the device was working correctly, no issues were observed in the generator.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device number 31736194l, and no internal actions related to the reported complaint were identified.No malfunction was observed during the product analysis.The root cause of the adverse event remains unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) states the following recommendations: when using the catheter with conventional systems (such as fluoroscopy or intracardiac echocardiography), with the carto¿ 3 system, careful catheter manipulation must be performed in order to avoid cardiac damage, perforation, or tamponade.Catheter advancement should be done under direct imaging guidance.Do not use excessive force to advance or withdraw the catheter when resistance is encountered.As part of johnson & johnson medtech's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VARIPULSE¿ BI-DIRECTIONAL CATHETER
Common Device Name
PERCUTANEOUS CARDIAC ABL CATH FOR TREATMT OF AFIB W IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
henry boden
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
9497882078
MDR Report Key24737995
Report Number2029046-2026-01031
Device Sequence Number8859716
Product Code QZI
UDI-Device Identifier10846835025460
UDI-Public(01)10846835025460(17)260902(10)31736194L
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
PMA/510(K) Number
P240006
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Notification
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/29/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberD141201
Device Lot Number31736194L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/05/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/07/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/31/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/29/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/03/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
3013300026-01/17/2025-00
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-