• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN ABRE VENOUS SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; STENT, ILIAC VEIN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN ABRE VENOUS SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; STENT, ILIAC VEIN Back to Search Results
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Stenosis (2263); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Date of Event 07/11/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Abstract reinterventions after stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction have an incidence of approximately 20% to 40% in the literature.The most common reason for this tends to be in-stent restenosis (isr).Although angioplasty historically has been the modality used to treat this problem, at times isr can be robust and associated with calcium deposits, leading to an inadequate outcome.Although newer debulking devices like the revcore can be helpful, sometimes even these devices are not adequate given their inability to secure a foothold on the fibrotic tissue to enable its removal.Using an intravascular lithotripsy catheter (12 mm) helps to soften the fibrotic tissue and fracture the calcium deposits, thus enabling angioplasty or a debulking device (if needed) to be successful.This case series outlines the author¿s experience with three patients with recalcitrant isr who benefited from using anintravascular lithotripsy catheter that enabled prolonged symptom improvement and stent patency over a follow-up of 19 months.However, the use of such a catheter for the treatment of venous isr represents an off-label use of the device.A 40-year-old african american woman with a history of hypothyroidism and migraines underwent right iliofemoral venous stenting for pain (vas pain score of 10/10) and swelling in the lower extremity (ceap clinical class 3 and vcss of 8).Stenting was carried out using a combination of an abre stent (medtronic, minneapolis, mn) cranially and a wallstent caudally for a diagnosis of multifocal nivl on ivus examination.After the procedure, she did well, with improvement of pain and swelling to the point they were no longer bothersome.However, approximately 18 months later, she developed a recurrence of the pain and swelling (vcss of 7).Dus examination revealed isr across the entirety of the stent with a maximum of 53% in the external iliac vein.She had been only on aspirin 81 mg, but was started on apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily and was scheduled for ivus confirmation of the diagnosis and stent reintervention.Technical aspects.Each patient was placed under general anesthesia in a supine position with preprocedural thromboprophylaxis in the form of enoxaparin (30 mg or 40 mg, based on body mass index) subcutaneously and bivalirudin (75 mg) intravenously.Access was obtained in the midthigh femoral vein under ultrasound guidance and an 11f access sheath was placed.A diagnostic ascending venogram was performed (fig 1).This demonstrated a reduction in the flow channel luminal area across the stentedsegmentinallthreepatients.Ivus interrogation (visions pv.035 digital ivus catheter, philips, amsterdam,thenetherlands) was thenperformedto confirm the diagnosis of stent malfunction.The presence of mild-to-severe isr across the stent column was noted with additional calcification noted in patient 1 (fig 2).Isodilation (angioplasty with a balloon equal to the rated diameter of the stent) was then carried out followed by hyperdilation (angioplasty with a balloon larger than the rated diameter of the stent) in each patient.Interval ivus interrogation was used to determine the extent of luminal gain.If an adequate flow channel was not restoredonivus examination(notedinallthreepatients), intravascular lithotripsy was used and focused on the areas of isr after angioplasty.To facilitate this, an 0.035¿ glide wire was switched outto an0.018¿ wire anda 12-mm lithotripsy balloon catheter was introduced to treat the previously determined areas.In total, 300 pulses were delivered in patients 1 and 2; only 210 pulses were used in patient 3 (fig 3).Ivus interrogation was again performed (fig 4) and repeat hyperdilation (fig 5) was carried out in areas where additional luminal gain was necessary.The goal was to secure a minimal luminal area of 125 mm2 , 150 mm2, and 200 mm2 in the stented common femoral, external iliac, andcommoniliac segments ,respectively.In all three patients, these flow channel luminal areas were attained on completion ivus interrogation at the end of the procedure.Completion venogram demonstrated good inflow, flow through the stent column, and outflow without any flow restrictions in all three patients (fig 6).The preprocedural antithrombotic regimen was restarted the evening of the procedure with all three patients disch arged on the day of the procedure with plans for continued long-term follow-up.No complications were notedeitherperiprocedurally or onsubsequentfollow-up visits.After the procedure.All three patients experienced symptom improvement after intervention, with the vcss improving from 9 to 4 in patient 1, from 7 to 4 in patient 2, and from 7 to 3 in patient 3.The stents were widely patent on dus in all three patients.These improvements were sustained over 19 months of followup.All patients will continue to with lifelong follow-ups with regular dus examinations alongside clinical visits.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Intravascular lithotripsy as a treatment option for recalcitrant in-stent restenosis in symptomatic patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction 2025 the author(s).Published by elsevier inc.On behalf of society for vascular surgery.This is an open access article under the cc by-nc-nd license (http://creativecommons.Org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Jvscit.2025.101921 medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ABRE VENOUS SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM
Common Device Name
STENT, ILIAC VEIN
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key24739653
Report Number2183870-2026-00144
Device Sequence Number19951960
Product Code QAN
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMS
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P200026
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/31/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/06/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/31/2026
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age40 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient RaceBlack Or African American
-
-