| Catalog Number |
0052-3046 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Ischemia (1942)
|
| Date of Event |
03/21/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
An impella cp was inserted via the femoral artery to support the 81-year-old female patient who had been admitted in with the indication of acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, presenting in scai stage e shock.The patient was supported by inotropes, vasopressors, and oxygen for respiratory needs prior to the pump placement.Other medical history was not shared.On the day of implant the team observed no flow beyond the impella sheath and as such the team placed an antegrade and contralateral sheath to allow for limb perfusion.Despite the perfusion and hemodynamic support, after 68 hours of support the cp was explanted and escalated to the impella 5.5 which was inserted via axillary artery.Ischemia may be influenced by patient-specific factors such as severe peripheral vascular disease, underlying critical illness, hemodynamic instability, and vascular access characteristics.The patient survived the harm of ischemia an does remain on the 5.5 pump to date.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by abiomed inc or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, abiomed inc, or its employees, caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: updated codes based on the results of the investigation.H11: updated based on the results of the investigation and added clinical review.The root cause of the injury was unable to be determined due to insufficient clinical details.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|