|
Model Number LITNG12HTORQ115-A |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Death (1802); Perforation (2001)
|
Event Date 11/09/2020 |
Event Type
Death
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product was not returned for evaluation.From the information provided, there is no indication that there was any device malfunction, nonconformance, or misuse that contributed to the reported event.Potential adverse events in the labeling with the indigo aspiration system include, but are not limited to, vascular complications (including vessel spasm, thrombosis, intimal disruption, dissection, or perforation), thromboembolic events, including death.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure to treat a pulmonary embolism using an indigo system aspiration catheter 12 (cat12), lightning aspiration tubing (lightning), a non-penumbra sheath (cook flexor 12fr) and a guidewire (amplatz).During the procedure, the physician placed the sheath in the pulmonary artery, then advanced the cat12 through the sheath.The physician connected the lightning to the cat12 and initiated aspiration.During aspiration, the indicator light on the lightning unit turned yellow and the lightning and cat12 appeared to be occluded.The cat12 was removed to be flushed, but no thrombus was found.The lightning was disconnected and cleared.The physician then placed the cat12 back into the patient, and the cat12 occluded again.The cat12 was removed again, and the sheath was noticed to be occluded.Therefore, the sheath was removed and flushed, then placed back into the patient over the guidewire.An image was taken, and the physician discovered a perforation in the pulmonary artery.The procedure ended at this point.The patient was initially stable.Approximately twenty minutes later, the patient became unstable.The patient expired on the same day, and the patient's death was related to the perforation.It is unknown if the cat12 was in the patient at the time the perforation occurred.It is also unknown which device being used caused the perforation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|