• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GIF-V70
Medical Device Problem Code Contamination (1120)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/04/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation.The device evaluation confirmed the customer's report and removed the broken piece of brush from the suction channel.In addition, service found additional issues.The suction cylinder was worn.The insulation resistance at the tip was out of specification due a scratched cap cover.The up/down knob was loose, and the up direction was out of specification due to wear of the angle wire.A liquid leak was observed due to a damaged air/water cylinder, and the water pressure was out of specification due to deformation of the nozzle.The light guide (lg) lens was broken, and the lg-bundle was in poor condition.The adhesive rubber was broken.The connecting tube was creased.Corrosion was observed at the electrical connector due to leakage and switch #1 was damaged.The investigation is ongoing; therefore, a definitive root cause of the reported event cannot be determined at this time.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented accordingly.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user facility reported that after reprocessing, while preparing the device for use, it was observed that a section of a disposable brush was broken and inside the suction channel of the gastrointestinal videoscope.There was no delay of the intended diagnostic procedure.The procedure was completed using another similar device with no patient impact reported due to the event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation.The device evaluation confirmed the customer's report and removed the broken piece of brush from the suction channel.In addition, service found additional issues.The suction cylinder was worn.The insulation resistance at the tip was out of specification due a scratched cap cover.The up/down knob was loose, and the up direction was out of specification due to wear of the angle wire.A liquid leak was observed due to a damaged air/water cylinder, and the water pressure was out of specification due to deformation of the nozzle.The light guide (lg) lens was broken, and the lg-bundle was in poor condition.The adhesive rubber was broken.The connecting tube was creased.Corrosion was observed at the electrical connector due to leakage and switch #1 was damaged.The investigation is ongoing; therefore, a definitive root cause of the reported event cannot be determined at this time.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented accordingly.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user facility reported that after reprocessing, while preparing the device for use, it was observed that a section of a disposable brush was broken and inside the suction channel of the gastrointestinal videoscope.There was no delay of the intended diagnostic procedure.The procedure was completed using another similar device with no patient impact reported due to the event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over 19 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, a definitive root cause could not be established.As documented within the investigation results, the cleaning brush became broken during reprocessing prior to use.Therefore, the cause of this suggested phenomenon was presumed as follows: the brush was broken due to its unfitting diameter to the channel diameter, brush deterioration or the like; or, the brush was broken due to the brush being hooked by the suction cylinder due to wear.Then, the broken part was left inside the biopsy channel.The reprocessing method at the facility differed from the instructions for use (ifu) recommendation.The ifu states: "insert the endo therapy accessory through the biopsy valve.Confirm that the endo therapy accessory extends smoothly from the distal end of the endoscope.Also, make sure that no foreign objects come out of the distal end of the endoscope." olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Common Device Name
GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13506279
Report Number8010047-2022-02738
Device Sequence Number6009493
Product Code FDS
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryKS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/28/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberGIF-V70
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/24/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/17/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/10/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/06/2002
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-