• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOLTA MEDICAL, INC. FRAXEL FTX LASER SYSTEM; POWERED LASER SURGICAL INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOLTA MEDICAL, INC. FRAXEL FTX LASER SYSTEM; POWERED LASER SURGICAL INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number MCSYSFTX
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Erythema (1840); Skin Discoloration (2074); Unintended Loss of Vascular Access (4867)
Date of Event 05/18/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The datacard log was returned for evaluation.Evaluation of the logs found no issues related to this event.Additionally, the system has software safeguards (such as a power on self-test) that will trigger error/event codes should system be outside of acceptable limits.The review of the system/data logs does not indicate there is any handpiece or system issue present.The customer performed the burn paper test and sent it in for review.The review of the burn paper showed proper pattern/coverage.The treatment tips do not delivery any energy and no treatment data is stored on the tip itself; there is no information to gather from their return.The exception to this would be if the tips plastic housing or component scratched the patient, which did not happen in this case.For other reported events, tips are not a viable source of evaluation data.According to fraxel ftx user manual, redness and discoloration are known potential reactions to treatment.The possibility of temporary and permanent skin color change is possible with any laser treatment.Post-inflammatory hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation are known complications of many laser treatments and may occur with the fraxel laser system.Following appropriate instructions for sun protection will lower the risk of pigmentation changes.A review of the manufacturing records showed all requirements were met.No nonconformities or anomalies were found related to this event when reviewing the device history record.The lot history, trend analysis, risk analysis and directions for use review were considered acceptable, with the product performing within anticipated rates.Based on the available information, this event is known reaction to treatment.At this time, no capa is necessary.
 
Event or Problem Description
A user facility reported post inflammatory hyperpigmentation and redness in the cheek area 8 weeks post fraxel ftx treatment.A noticeable pattern started right away that was very red.The redness stayed and then brown appeared darker, maybe 1-2 weeks post treatment.Treatment included alastin nectar and stratacel scar gel.The current status was reported as persistent cheek discoloration with a visible demarcation line under the eyes corresponding to the laser treatment boundary.The outcome was noted as discoloration.Available images of the patient¿s cheeks were reviewed by the medical reviewer.A total of four undated images were provided, displaying mild discoloration on both cheeks.Based on available information indicating that permanent discoloration is expected, the case was reassessed as serious.All topicals were stopped 2 weeks prior to the treatment, which included skin better alpha ret clearing and glymed mandelic acid cleanser.Immediately after the treatment, elta laser enzyme gel was used.Post care topicals included nectar, neova copper peptide mask, and neova copper peptide lotion.No other treatments (besides the one reported) were being performed in the same area where symptoms were reported.The patient has not undergone any other treatments in the same symptom area within the past 90 days.The patient has had prior aesthetic treatments on this area, which include: lutronic lasemd, skin pen microneedling, and neo aerolase sporadically.The patient reports no sun exposure during healing and post healing and that sunscreen was used.The patient's skin type is recorded as type 3.For the 1550 wavelength, the highest energy level used was 10j, 3% percent coverage, and 4 number of passes completed.For 1927 wavelength, the highest energy level used was 10j, 1% percent coverage, and 4 number of passes completed.No system errors occurred nor was anything out of the ordinary noticed during treatment.The tip used in this treatment has not been used to treat other patients.A burn paper test was not performed prior to using the tip.It was reported a zimmer cooling unit was used was used during treatment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FRAXEL FTX LASER SYSTEM
Common Device Name
POWERED LASER SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOLTA MEDICAL, INC.
11720 north creek pkwy n
suite 100
bothell WA 98011
Manufacturer (Section G)
SOLTA MEDICAL, INC.
11720 north creek pkwy n
suite 100
bothell WA 98011
Manufacturer Contact
sundeep jain
11720 north creek pkwy n
suite 100
bothell, WA 98011
4254202135
MDR Report Key22866855
Report Number3011423170-2025-00295
Device Sequence Number14746513
Product Code GEX
UDI-Device Identifier00816995027805
UDI-Public00816995027805
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K242142
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 07/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberMCSYSFTX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/24/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/21/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/19/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-