|
The datacard log was returned for evaluation.Evaluation of the logs found no issues related to this event.Additionally, the system has software safeguards (such as a power on self-test) that will trigger error/event codes should system be outside of acceptable limits.The review of the system/data logs does not indicate there is any handpiece or system issue present.The customer performed the burn paper test and sent it in for review.The review of the burn paper showed proper pattern/coverage.The treatment tips do not delivery any energy and no treatment data is stored on the tip itself; there is no information to gather from their return.The exception to this would be if the tips plastic housing or component scratched the patient, which did not happen in this case.For other reported events, tips are not a viable source of evaluation data.According to fraxel ftx user manual, redness and discoloration are known potential reactions to treatment.The possibility of temporary and permanent skin color change is possible with any laser treatment.Post-inflammatory hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation are known complications of many laser treatments and may occur with the fraxel laser system.Following appropriate instructions for sun protection will lower the risk of pigmentation changes.A review of the manufacturing records showed all requirements were met.No nonconformities or anomalies were found related to this event when reviewing the device history record.The lot history, trend analysis, risk analysis and directions for use review were considered acceptable, with the product performing within anticipated rates.Based on the available information, this event is known reaction to treatment.At this time, no capa is necessary.
|
|
A user facility reported post inflammatory hyperpigmentation and redness in the cheek area 8 weeks post fraxel ftx treatment.A noticeable pattern started right away that was very red.The redness stayed and then brown appeared darker, maybe 1-2 weeks post treatment.Treatment included alastin nectar and stratacel scar gel.The current status was reported as persistent cheek discoloration with a visible demarcation line under the eyes corresponding to the laser treatment boundary.The outcome was noted as discoloration.Available images of the patient¿s cheeks were reviewed by the medical reviewer.A total of four undated images were provided, displaying mild discoloration on both cheeks.Based on available information indicating that permanent discoloration is expected, the case was reassessed as serious.All topicals were stopped 2 weeks prior to the treatment, which included skin better alpha ret clearing and glymed mandelic acid cleanser.Immediately after the treatment, elta laser enzyme gel was used.Post care topicals included nectar, neova copper peptide mask, and neova copper peptide lotion.No other treatments (besides the one reported) were being performed in the same area where symptoms were reported.The patient has not undergone any other treatments in the same symptom area within the past 90 days.The patient has had prior aesthetic treatments on this area, which include: lutronic lasemd, skin pen microneedling, and neo aerolase sporadically.The patient reports no sun exposure during healing and post healing and that sunscreen was used.The patient's skin type is recorded as type 3.For the 1550 wavelength, the highest energy level used was 10j, 3% percent coverage, and 4 number of passes completed.For 1927 wavelength, the highest energy level used was 10j, 1% percent coverage, and 4 number of passes completed.No system errors occurred nor was anything out of the ordinary noticed during treatment.The tip used in this treatment has not been used to treat other patients.A burn paper test was not performed prior to using the tip.It was reported a zimmer cooling unit was used was used during treatment.
|