• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EL.EN. ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING S.P.A. ELITE IQ

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EL.EN. ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING S.P.A. ELITE IQ Back to Search Results
Model Number M122B1
Medical Device Problem Code Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn (2696)
Date of Event 10/03/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
In date (b)(6) 2025 we receive a communication from the us importer, cynosure, relative to an adverse event in which a patient developed burns following a hair removal treatment, on the legs, with the device elite iq.The actual device involved in the event is an elite iq, manufactured by el.En.Electronic engineering spa, marketed in the usa with 510(k) k193426.The event took place at (b)(6).The patient complained with the clinic about burs that have developed on the treatment area (legs) following the hair removal treatment.The us importer, following the initial communication, proceed to gather more detailed information about the event.The operator who performed the treatment admitted that the patient went to a vacation in (b)(6) and the treatment area was still tanned.Operator reported to have started the treatment with the yag laser source then changed to alex.Alex laser source is not the proper wavelength to be used on darker skin types (such as tanned skin).Parameters used for the treatment were: alex laser source (755 nm), 15j/cm2, 20ms with 18mm handpiece with one pass.The patient was prescribed with biafine cream as preventative post-treatment care.Pictures of the lesion were also disclosed in which it is clear that the patient developed blistering and burns on the area with the worst effects on the shin.The pictures has been reviewed by both the us importer's clinical staff as well as ours (as manufacturer of the device).The lesion has been evaluated as a serious injury because they may require medical attention to prevent a permanent impairment.Cynosure, as us importer of the device, have already reported this case to the us fda with a dedicated mdr report code mdr1222993-2025-00051 in date october the 29th, 2025.Based on that, in accordance with 21 cfr part 803.50(b)(2) we as manufacturer of the device are obliged to submit our own report to the fda.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
We as manufacturer of the device involved in the event performed our own investigation based on the information shared by the us importer.The us importer and our clinical department have evaluated all the available information and concluded the following: the actual medical device involved in the event has been evaluated by cynosure's authorized technician, in date 17/10/2025 and found working properly within specifications.The us importer concluded that the event has been caused by a user error where the physician used treatment's parameters not adequate in relation to the patient's conditions.All the available information has been evaluated by our crp manager who concluded the following: he agrees with the conclusion made by the us importer, in relation to the root cause, where the event has been caused by a user error in which the physician have not used the proper treatment's parameters.The operator's manual, code om122b1-d1_g.V07 (actual revision shipped with the device) clearly identifies patient that have recent sun exposure as contraindicated for the treatment (chapter 'contraindications').Burns are clearly identified as foreseeable side effects of the treatment on the operator's manual, code om122b1-d1_g.V07 (actual revision shipped with the device) at chapter 'adverse effects'.The root cause identified as a user error in which the physician failed to evaluate the patient's condition and proceeded by treating a tanned area.Based on the investigation carried out no design issues of malfunction has been found to be contributory to the event.That said, no actions has been deemed necessary.The present mdr report is considered as a final report unless fda has more questions about it.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ELITE IQ
Common Device Name
ELITE IQ
Manufacturer (Section D)
EL.EN. ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING S.P.A.
via baldanzese 17
calenzano, firenze 50041
IT  50041
Manufacturer (Section G)
EL.EN. ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING S.P.A.
via baldanzese, 17
calenzano, firenze 50041
IT   50041
Manufacturer Contact
andrea checchi
via baldanzese, 17
calenzano, firenze 50041
IT   50041
MDR Report Key23643346
Report Number3001431138-2025-00011
Device Sequence Number10099872
Product Code GEX
UDI-Device Identifier08057017760450
UDI-Public(01)08057017760450(11)221020
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K193426
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Y
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 11/25/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Other
Device Model NumberM122B1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/28/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/25/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/21/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexFemale
-
-