• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE LTD CUSTOM DISTAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT IMPLANT; LIMB SALVAGE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE LTD CUSTOM DISTAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT IMPLANT; LIMB SALVAGE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number BME6616
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Arthralgia (2355); Cancer (3262)
Event Date 06/20/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
In an email dated (b)(6) 2014, the sales agent contacted the company's design office as requested by the clinician to obtain options for a planned revision of the tibial component on a distal femoral case 1st done on (b)(6) 1991.It was further noted that the patient has a long stem metal tibia component that is causing soreness and needs replacing with either another metal or even an all poly component.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The patient was implanted with a custom extra small mets smiles knee.Our records indicate that the patient had a revision in 1999.As the patient is encountering discomfort, the surgeon is contemplating further revision.The company's design department reviewed the patient's recent x-rays and have suggested that the patient undergo a tibial revision with a small mets smiles knee.The physician is currently reviewing the suggested design proposal.A supplemental will be provided upon receipt of follow-up information from the facility.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The patient has undergone successful revision surgery for a distal femur.The cause of the revision has been attributed to pain requiring the revision.The reported pain and discomfort could be as a result of patient factors such as trauma, obesity, activity levels, disease progression and/or surgical factors or preferences and not necessarily related to the device itself.There were no reported complications resulting from the revision surgery.This complaint is being closed and is being tracked and trended.
 
Event Description
In an email dated (b)(6) 2014, the sales agent contacted the company's design office as requested by the clinician, to obtain options for a planned revision of a tibial component on a distal femur case first done on (b)(6) 1991.It was further noted that the patient has a long stem metal tibia component that is causing soreness and needs replacing with either another metal or even an all poly component.This is a supplemental report to 3004105610-2014-002 (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CUSTOM DISTAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT IMPLANT
Type of Device
LIMB SALVAGE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE LTD
210 centennial avenue
centennial park
elstree, WD6 3 SJ
UK  WD6 3SJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE LTD
210 centennial avenue
centennial park
elstree, WD6 3 SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
Manufacturer Contact
diana rogers
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood, WD6 3-SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
2082386500
MDR Report Key3954765
MDR Text Key4556551
Report Number3004105610-2014-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K140898
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/20/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/18/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date04/09/1992
Device Model NumberBME6616
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/31/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2012
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age37 YR
-
-