ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SAFIRE¿ BLU¿ DUO ABLATION CATHETER IRRIGATED BI-DIRECTIONAL 4 MM TIP THERMOCOUPL; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS CARDIAC ABLATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number A088107 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
Event Date 12/29/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
During a pulmonary vein isolation procedure using a safire blu duo ablation catheter, a pericardial effusion occurred.A transseptal puncture was performed with a non-sjm transseptal needle and a fast cath swartz transseptal introducer was advanced into the left atrium.A reflexion spiral ep catheter was then placed in the left atrium.A second transseptal puncture was performed with the non-sjm transseptal needle and an unsuccessful attempt to advance an agilis nxt introducer was made.The agilis nxt introducer was then replaced with a fast cath hemostasis introducer, through which a safire blu duo ablation catheter was placed.During manipulation of the catheter, the patient became hypotensive and a non-sjm ice catheter revealed a pericardial effusion, which was confirmed by an echocardiogram.Iv fluids were administered and a pericardiocentesis was performed, which stabilized the patient.The patient is currently doing well.There were no performance issues with the safire blu duo ablation catheter.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).One 7f, 4mm, medium curl, bi-directional, safire blu duo irrigated ablation catheter was received for evaluation.Bends in the shaft were noted just proximal to electrode ring 4 and at 4.90¿ proximal to the distal tip.The catheter deflected in both directions, but no longer deflected into the correct shape and no longer met specifications in one direction, due to bends in the shaft.The cause of the bends in the shaft is consistent with damage during use.Electrical testing revealed no anomalies.The device met specifications prior to release from sjm manufacturing facilities as supported by a review of the device history record.The cause of the reported pericardial effusion was unable to be confirmed and remains unknown.Per the ifu, vascular perforation in an inherent risk of any electrode placement.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|