A patient was tested on (b)(6) 2015 at 6:06 pm on inform ii meter (serial number (b)(4)) and received a result of 235 mg/dl with no symptoms.
On the morning of (b)(6) 2015, the caller stated that the patient was feeling low symptoms of stomach pain.
They were tested on the same meter at 6:19 am and a result of rr lo was obtained.
Rr lo is an alarm set by the institution for results that are below their defined reportable range threshold but are within the system measurement range of 10 mg/dl to 600 mg/dl.
The reportable range for the facility is 20 mg/dl to 600 mg/dl.
The nurse testing the patient interpreted the results of rr lo to be a high blood sugar , however, the alarm was notifying them that the results were actually below the institution's defined reportable range.
It was further reported that the nurse did not treat the patient with d50 as she should of have based on the result.
She tested the patient again at 6:20 am and at 6:33 am with a result of rr lo on the same meter.
The nurse then tested the patient on a second inform ii meter (serial number (b)(4)) at 6:49am.
The result at that time was also rr lo.
The nurse gave the patient 10 units of novolog as treatment since she had misinterpreted the previous results of rr lo to mean the patient's blood glucose was high.
The patient symptoms of stomach pain and shaking became worse.
The patient did not lose consciousness.
The nurse then tested the patient again on inform ii meter (serial number (b)(4)) at 6:54 am and received a result of lo.
Lo indicates the blood glucose is below 10 mg/dl.
At that point the nurse gave the patient d50.
The patient was tested again at 7:02am on this meter and obtained a result of 271 mg/dl.
The patient's symptoms improved after they were given the d50.
The patient is currently doing okay.
All of the results were obtained using strips from the same vial of strips.
The suspect product was requested to be returned, however, the customer no longer has the vial of strips that were used for the aforementioned tests.
|