Model Number 1121-60T |
Device Problems
Device Issue (2379); Device Operational Issue (2914); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Scar Tissue (2060)
|
Event Date 12/21/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Initial: device requested and to be received by manufacturer for evaluation.The device history reviews (dhrs) were reviewed for final pack lot w358291 and sterile pack lot w3298625 and there were no anomalies noted.Root cause for this event could not be determined as no device has been returned for evaluation and reviewing of the manufacturing records did not reveal any applicable discrepancies.No malfunctioned of the device could be confirmed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported on 21 december 2016 that a patient had undergone a four day trial period for spinal cord stimulation.The physician had difficulty placing the bilateral trial leads initially.The patient presented with scar tissue/adhesions.At the end of the trial, the first trial lead was removed without difficulty.The second trial was removed with force.A portion of the distal end of the lead remained.The remainder was removed through a cut-down without complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of this report 01/17/2017 updated to 02/16/2017.Date returned to manufacturer updated to 01/09/2017.Date received by manufacturer (b)(6) 2016 updated to 02/15/2017.Type of report "initial" updated to "follow-up." if follow-up, what type updated to additional information and device evaluation.Device evaluated by manufacturer "no" updated to "yes." (b)(4).Visual inspection showed the first trial lead body was partially separated from the distal end of the lead at the contacts/electrodes.The second trial lead was separated in two pieces, consisting of the distal end of the lead with contacts and one piece with contacts remaining at the proximal end of the lead.No evidence could be determined to be inherently wrong with the leads themselves that would have been present prior to the lead extractions during the trial period.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported on (b)(6) 2016 that a patient had undergone a four day trial period for spinal cord stimulation.The physician had difficulty placing the bilateral trial leads initially.The patient presented with scar tissue/adhesions.At the end of the trial, the first trial lead was removed without difficulty.The second trial was removed with force.A portion of the distal end of the lead remained.The remainder was removed through a cut-down without complications.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|