• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER CORPORATION TRITANIUM CAGE; INTERBODY CAGE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER CORPORATION TRITANIUM CAGE; INTERBODY CAGE Back to Search Results
Medical Device Problem Code Material Fragmentation (1261)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Date of Event 02/19/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
During a routine complex spine surgery, an l2-l3 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, i elected to use a stryker corporation ((b)(4)) "tritanium" inter body device ("cage"), 28 mm length, 11 mm in height and 6 degrees of lordosis.Using standard surgical technique, i inserted the inter body device into the prepared l2-l3 disc space.The initial 50% of insertion was by manual pushing, and the final 50% of insertion by gentle tapping on the back end of the inserter device with a mallet.Once in place, a fluoroscopic image was taken, that demonstrated an abnormal slight obliquity to the device.Upon inspection, i discovered that the proximal (i.E., portion nearest the junction with the inserter) one third of the implant had separated (fractured) from the rest of the implant, and other parts of the implant had simply crumbled.Because of this failure, i needed to then remove the fragments of the inter body cage from the disk space using chisels and graspers.No visible injury occurred to the pt as a result of the device failure.I completed the procedure without incident with an inter body device from a different mfr.I collected the device fragments and had them sent back to stryker corporation.Upon inquiring about this failure with stryker reps later that day, i was informed that stryker is aware of over 20 cases where a tritanium implant has fractured into pieces during surgical implantation.Obviously i find this extremely alarming as a tritanium inter body implant should not break into pieces during insertion, and it furthermore makes me very concerned whether such tritanium devices will remain functional and in one pieces when subjected to constant loading cycles in an upright and ambulating pt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRITANIUM CAGE
Common Device Name
INTERBODY CAGE
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER CORPORATION
kalamazoo MI
MDR Report Key7302522
Report NumberMW5075574
Device Sequence Number12270722
Product Code MAX
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Device Explanted Year2018
Reporter Type Voluntary
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/26/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/19/2018
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/27/2018
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient Weight118
-
-