The original procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2014.Although the working length for the contralateral leg was 65mm, the 73mm was chosen and deployed slightly occluding the left internal iliac artery.The physician tried to push up the contralateral leg by using a balloon, but no success.Right internal iliac artery was blocked by blood clots.The patient was closely monitored and the physician opted to withhold a treatment.Upon completion of the procedure, the aneurysm was successfully excluded.Implanted devices: 1).Sg-hbb-24-96; lot: bw50211-1; exp.Date: 04/10/2016; mfr date: apr 2014.2) sg-hbl-73-14; lot: bz49432-1; exp.Date: 05/26/2016; mfr date: may 2014.3) sg-hgl-56-12; lot: bz 49047-1; exp.Date: 04/17/2016; mfr date: apr 2014.
|
Udi#: (b)(4).According to the complaint description, the contralateral leg length should have been 56mm and not 73mm.The oversizing and misplacement of the contralateral leg may have contributed to the limb occlusion.The ifu states: "each stent graft must be ordered in a size appropriate to fit the patient's anatomy.Physicians should use adequate diagnostic techniques, including ct imaging, to evaluate fully individual needs of the patient".No further updates required.The risk mgmt file was reviewed and internal iliac occlusion is listed in the hazard analysis under section c 4.2 - misplacement of contra-lateral limb.No further update is required.There is no info to suggest the device has not worked as intended.
|