• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTELLIVUE INFORMATION CENTER IX; CENTRAL STATION MONITOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTELLIVUE INFORMATION CENTER IX; CENTRAL STATION MONITOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 866389
Device Problem Device Alarm System (1012)
Patient Problems Cardiac Arrest (1762); Death (1802); Fall (1848)
Event Date 04/25/2020
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.
 
Event Description
The customer clinical engineer (biomed) reported that a nursing discovered that a patient had fallen off their bed (l5605-01).The nurse notified clinical engineering; no alarm conditions were indicated at the philips information center ix (pic ix) from the telemetry device connected to the patient (mx40).When asked whether mx40 leads ever disconnected from the patient, the answer was no.However, nursing stated they should have received an asystole alert for this bed.The patient was reported to have died four days later.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A philips field service engineer (fse) went to the customer site.The fse tested the mx40, and found it was working with no issue, and verified the connection to the nearest network access point (ap).The fse was not able to test the pic ix at the time, however, the customer biomed confirmed with the philips complaint investigator (ci), that both the mx40 and piic ix involved were tested and verified to be working properly.The fse obtained alarm logs from the pic ix for this incident, which was verified to have occurred between 11:22pm-11:23pm on (b)(6) 2020.The alarm log was reviewed by the ci.An asystole alarm was seen to have occurred during this time at 23:22:57.Additional alarms occurred during this time, until 23:31:18 and the alarms were silenced; the asystole then ended at 23:31:31.The fse noted that the philips products were rebooted the next day.The customer also asked for activity from (b)(6) 2020 at 21:58 to (b)(6) 2020 at 22:49.Follow-up with the customer by a philips clinical specialist (cs) was performed.The customer indicated that they found no issues with the pic ix or the patient worn device (mx40); both devices remained in use.There was no product malfunction; this is considered a user issue.The pic ix alarm logs were reviewed, and the device alarmed for asystole, during the time it was alleged to not have alarmed; the alarm was eventually silenced.Additional alarms occurred after this event with reminders being sent, until the patient showed being transferred to another bed.No further investigation or action is warranted at this time.Submission of a report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, distributor, manufacturer, or product caused or contributed to the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIVUE INFORMATION CENTER IX
Type of Device
CENTRAL STATION MONITOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS
3000 minuteman road
andover MA 01810
MDR Report Key10060984
MDR Text Key191106192
Report Number1218950-2020-02845
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHX
UDI-Device Identifier00884838048645
UDI-Public(01)00884838048645
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K102495
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/27/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number866389
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/27/2020
Initial Date FDA Received05/15/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/27/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/29/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age55 YR
-
-