As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation, however photos have been provided.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Expiry date (02/2021).(b)(4).
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history record review was performed for the reported lot number and this lot meets all release criteria.The manufacturing review did not indicate any possible manufacturing issue that could be related to the reported event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was received and reviewed.The photo shows the bifurcation, clamps, extension legs and part of the hubs of a hemostar catheter and the entry point at the skin.The catheter appeared to be sutured to the skin of the patient.Based on the photo review, opacification, stretching and protrusion in a segment of the extension leg (aneurysm) can be confirmed.However, the reported poor flow cannot be confirmed as there was no device was returned for sample evaluation.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 02/2021),g4, h6 (device code:1248).H11: h6(result and conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|