|
Catalog Number 72290128 |
Device Problem
Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
Injury (2348)
|
Event Date 04/30/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during arthroscopy surgery the firstpass mini jaw's broke off when in the joint.There was a delay of under 30 min, but it is unknown how was the surgery completed.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: b5, d4.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during arthroscopy surgery the firstpass mini failed to shoot the thread properly and take it outside.Additionally, the jaw of the device broke off when in the joint.There was a delay of under 30 min which concluded in cancellation of the procedure due to not having a backup device available.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device reported, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.A relationship between the product and reported incident cannot be established.A review of manufacturing records for the reported lot number 2047432 found no non-conformances or anomalies during manufacturing process related to the reported event.A complaint history review found related failures; this failure mode will be trended to assess for any necessary corrective actions.Clinical evaluation was completed and concluded that no relevant supporting clinical information has been provided to assist with a clinical investigation, and the patient's current condition is unknown.Therefore based on insufficient information, a thorough clinical assessment cannot be performed at this time.Per e-mail communication the broken piece of the jaw device was removed from the patient using graspers.The acl repair procedure was completed however the root repair had to be canceled.Should any additional clinical information be provided this complaint will be re-evaluated.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions to prevent damage to the device during use.Risk management documents were reviewed finding no additional risks that require to be added to the reference document.A visual inspection and functional evaluation cannot be performed and customer´s complaint cannot be confirmed.Potential factors unrelated to the design or manufacture of the device that may lead to the failure reported include, but are not limited to: (1) excessive force (2) tissue thickness (3) damage or debris on the device tip during passes.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.There were no indications during manufacturing record review that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device, used in treatment, was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the returned device and the reported incident.A visual inspection of the returned instrument shows a broken suture capture.A functional evaluation revealed the needle deployed, there is broken suture capture.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A review of risk management files found that the reported failure was documented appropriately.Clinical evaluation was completed and concluded that no relevant supporting clinical information has been provided to assist with a clinical investigation, and the patient's current condition is unknown.Therefore based on insufficient information, a thorough clinical assessment cannot be performed at this time.Per e-mail communication the broken piece of the jaw device was removed from the patient using graspers.The acl repair procedure was completed however the root repair had to be canceled.Should any additional clinical information be provided this complaint will be re-evaluated.The complaint was confirmed.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include: (1) excessive force (2) tissue thickness (3) damage or debris on the device tip during passes.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|