• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 13B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 13B; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number LXMC13
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 05/15/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/5/2020.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: what was the date of implant? what were the first clinical symptoms that provided evidence of an erosion and when did they first occur? has the patient had any dilations, egd, or other procedure between the linx implant and discovery of the erosion? please describe and include the dates of the procedures.Are pictures or videos available? what is the product code for the linx device that was removed? what is the lot number of the linx device? how many beads eroded? where were the eroded beads positioned? which best describes the device removal approach? endoscopically removed the eroded beads initially & laparoscopically removed the device at a later date.Endoscopically removed the eroded beads & laparoscopically removed the device the same day.Endoscopically removed the entire device.Laparoscopically removed the entire device.Was the patient stented? what is the current condition of the patient? response received: male patient.(b)(6).Bmi 22.05.Healthy, no significant medical history besides gerd.Allgy: pcn.No apparent trauma or event that would have initiated an erosion.No trauma or extenuating circumstances, patient is a healthy (b)(6) year old male, bmi of 22.Had been doing well until just recently¿presented with dysphagia to outside provider, egd showed beads in lumen.What was the date of implant? (b)(6) 2016.What were the first clinical symptoms that provided evidence of an erosion and when did they first occur? dysphagia prompted an egd by an outside provider on 7may 2020.Patient had been doing well up to that point.Has the patient had any dilations, egd, or other procedure between the linx implant and discovery of the erosion? please describe and include the dates of the procedures.None.Are pictures or videos available? yes, i have the video.What is the product code for the linx device that was removed? lxmc13.What is the lot number of the linx device? 8420.How many beads eroded? 5-6 including the clasp.Where were the eroded beads positioned? anterior erosion on the gastric side of the gej.Which best describes the device removal approach? endoscopically removed the entire device.Was the patient stented? no.What is the current condition of the patient? has not seen back in follow up but assuming patient is doing fine.Per video evaluation by ethicon medical: i reviewed a video related to (b)(4) regarding an endoscopy procedure.The video showed an upper endoscopy procedure.On antegrade examination the esophagus appeared normal.There was evidence of an eroded linx msa device that showed the clasp and one or 2 beads.The erosion appeared anteriorly in the esophagus approximately 1 cm below the squamo-columnar junction.On retroflexed view the erosion was again evident.There was some food debris attached to the beads.The linx joining wire was cut with an endoscopic cutter.The device was then removed endoscopically through the esophagus.An intact 13- bead device was removed.Inspection after removal showed some swelling at the gej but no excessive bleeding.Assessment is that the video depicted a 13-bead device that had eroded through into the esophagus that was successfully removed endoscopically.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a linx device had eroded into the esophagus and was removed endoscopically.It is unknown if there were any adverse consequences to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 13B
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview, MN 
6107428552
MDR Report Key10122914
MDR Text Key194780093
Report Number3008766073-2020-00074
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005332
UDI-Public00855106005332
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/15/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/18/2019
Device Model NumberLXMC13
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC13
Device Lot Number8420
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/15/2020
Initial Date FDA Received06/05/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/19/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age35 YR
-
-