On (b)(6) 2020, a follow-up phone conversation with mr.(b)(6) described the patient conditions as "high bmi" and "large deep veins." in addition, the clinician stated that on (b)(6) 2020 he noted that the catheter was "out 2 cm" (extending outside the patient).The clinician stated that they cleaned, re-hydrated, and re-inserted the catheter without issue; however, on (b)(6) 2020, the hydropicc was leaking, and was subsequently replaced with a non-hydropicc device.It was mr.Bunch's opinion that the cause of the kink and crack was due to either the patient snagging the device on something, or due to manipulation of the device or the patient, likely during a dressing change.The clinician stated that the hydropicc was implanted on (b)(6) 2020 without issue, and "excellent blood flow" was confirmed at the completion of the procedure.
|
It was reported that the clinician was notified that the hydropicc "wasn't working, repositioning the infusion resulted in leaking at site." when the clinician arrived on site, they "sutured cut line pulled back at [sic] found to be kinked and cracked at the suture wing stem/catheter junction.".
|