The reason for this revision surgery was reported due to loosening.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 1.6 years apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was not available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A search of djo records produced no results.Because of the acquisition by djo surgical, an extended search of zimmer biomet records cannot be conducted.Any records before the acquisition date, that have not been forwarded, will not be made available.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to loosening.The findings did not lead to a firm conclusion since the needed records were not made available at the time of this investigation.If more information is received later, the complaint will be updated.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|