• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBY4C0315-B
Device Problems Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/25/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the lumbar artery using ruby coils and non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while advancing the ruby coil through the rotating hemostasis valve (rhv).Therefore, the physician decided to retract the ruby coil.It was also reported that flushing did not solve the issue.Subsequently, while attempting to advance the same ruby coil, the pusher assembly became broken.Therefore, the ruby coil was removed.The procedure was completed using another coil and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 5.0 cm from the proximal end.The embolization coil was intact with the pusher assembly and had offset coil winds near its distal end.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed a kink on its pusher assembly and offset coil winds on the embolization coil.If the device is forcefully advanced against resistance, damages such as these may occur.The non-penumbra microcatheter and rhv used in the procedure were not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the root cause of the resistance experienced during the procedure was unable to be determined.During functional testing, the returned ruby coil was able to advance through a demonstration rhv and a lantern without issue.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key10172004
MDR Text Key195714814
Report Number3005168196-2020-00783
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548018324
UDI-Public00814548018324
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,05/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBY4C0315-B
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0315
Device Lot NumberF85749
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/08/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/26/2020
Initial Date FDA Received06/18/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/25/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/15/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-