The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, an investigation cannot be performed.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in a branch of the ileocolic artery using a ruby coil lp and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician advanced the ruby coil lp into the target vessel using the microcatheter.While forming the ruby coil in the target vessel, the physician was not satisfied with the way the ruby coil lp was forming; therefore, the physician decided to remove the ruby coil lp and try a larger coil.While re-sheathing the ruby coil lp, the physician had difficulty and subsequently, the ruby coil lp detached from the pusher assembly while being pulled all the way back into its introducer sheath.The procedure was completed using another coil and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|