• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US ARTHRO CLEVERHOOK-RIGHT *EA; SKIN/TISSUE HOOK

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US ARTHRO CLEVERHOOK-RIGHT *EA; SKIN/TISSUE HOOK Back to Search Results
Model Number 214640
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/01/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information, it was reported that blind device received in decon site on 03/20/2020 with no complaint information attached and could not be associated with an existing complaint.The device was received and evaluated.Visual observation reveals that it appears to be old, indicate possible heavy use.Also, the laser lines were faded.Functional testing indicated difficulties operating the device, there was resistance as trying to close and open the jaws.The lower jaw was loose contributing to the holding failure.This failure can be attributed to normal field wear.It was determined from past investigations of similar failure modes that this product in general is susceptible to the autoclave process negatively affecting the laser lines.Also, the loose failure is attributed to rough handling or possibly coming into contact with another hard object.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: (b)(4), and no non-conformances were identified.At this time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted, as the device is fully functional.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family to monitor the extent to which this complaint is observed in the field.Device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: (b)(4), and no non-conformances were identified.
 
Event Description
It was reported that arthro cleverhook-right *ea had an unspecified malfunction.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the lower jaw on the device was loose.It was not reported if the device was used in surgery, or if there was patient involvement.It was not reported if there were any delays in the surgical procedure, or if a spare device was available for use.There were no reports of any injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
SKIN/TISSUE HOOK
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
6013142063
MDR Report Key10206441
MDR Text Key196842614
Report Number1221934-2020-01671
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NBH
UDI-Device Identifier10886705004218
UDI-Public10886705004218
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number214640
Device Catalogue Number214640
Device Lot Number18N01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/28/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/26/2020
Initial Date FDA Received06/29/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/05/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-