A review of dhr has demonstrated that the mid-c system was manufactured, tested, and released according to apifix specifications.A review of the patient's x-rays demonstrates implant breakage.Along the time from implantation to the 2 years follow-up, the patient's kyphosis significantly increased (from 49° at pre-op to around 70° at the last follow up).The increase in kyphosis angle most likely pushed against the center of the implant causing it to break.Chen et al., [1] demonstrated in their study comparing treatment in eos patients with and without hyperkyphosis that the most common implant-related and alignment related complication in the eos hyperkyphotic population was rod fracture [1] chen z, qiu y, zhu z, li s.How does hyperkyphotic early-onset scoliosis respond to growing rod treatment, 2016;00:1-6.
|
Patient was operated as part of clinical study af-mid-c-eos 01-16 (protocol number dms 1356 rev d, screening # 053-0001) on (b)(6) 2018, with internal apifix number 002.On (b)(6) 2020, the surgeon reported by e-mail that the 2 year fu x-ray showed a breakage of the mid-c xlp implant at the base.Also, the surgeon reported that the patient complained of light pain located at the thoracic hub for the last 2-3 months.No injury has occurred and during the clinical examination, the patient was free of any pain.The clinical appearance did not indicate anything.
|