|
Model Number 014R |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 06/02/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal reference: (b)(4).This case was reviewed and investigated according to the manufacturer¿s policy.Facility declined to provide patient information.No information available.The implant or explant dates are not applicable to this device.Not applicable for this device.No information available.The returned portions of the device was visually and microscopically inspected.The device was received in two (2) separate pieces in two (2) separate packages.The device was observed to be broken at the distal shaft and a third-party device was returned stuck to the proximal shaft.The proximal shaft and distal shaft were wavy, twisted, and kinked.The guidewire exit port was intact but stretched.The microcables were detached near the rx bond and contained within the distal shaft.The core wire was intact and contained with the distal shaft.A portion of the detached microcables was observed within the distal shaft.The distal end of the broken distal shaft was stretched, resulting in an irregular edge.The inner member was exposed out of the distal shaft, was stretched, and had an irregular edge.The distal tip of the device was intact and in good condition.A gap was observed between the scanner body and distal tip.The entirety of the distal tip and scanner body was intact; no missing piece was observed.The remaining portion of microcables were still attached to the scanner weld legs.Portions of the distal shaft were flattened.The proximal end of the distal shaft was stretched and tied in a knot.The probable cause of the reported ¿the tip of the device was sheared off¿ failure is mechanical strain, as evidenced by the stretched inner member and distal shaft with both pieces of the device.Strain, impact, and forces associated with use can affect the integrity of the device.Do not apply to this submission.The manufacturing documentation for this device was reviewed and the device met all quality and manufacturing release criteria.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported during a planned diagnostic peripheral procedure, the tip of the manufacturer's device was sheared off.The device was plugged into the system, flushed, advanced through the sheath, to iliacs.The device became stuck, physician removed the devices as a system at which time the tip broke off in the radial artery.The patient was transported to the hospital via ambulance to have the separated portion surgically removed.This adverse event is being submitted because the manufacture's device separated in the patient.Additional medical and surgical intervention, and hospitalization were required.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|