The user facility reported that the single use guidewire was used during the procedure; during ercp, the distal tip and flexible part of the guidewire were fractured.A fragment fell off in the bile duct and the fragment was retrieved with a balloon successfully with no harm to the patient's health.The procedure was suspended to be rescheduled later.Concurrently used endoscope was spyscope from bsc.Seeking was performed when the actual sample was passing through the channel of the spyscope.The actual sample reversed once; however, no problem was found at that time.Afterward, the actual sample became fractured when being withdrawn.
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to update section h3, and to provide the completed investigation results.The infectiousness of the actual sample could no longer be confirmed; therefore, the evaluation of the actual sample was completed through the plastic bag.Visual inspection of the actual sample contained in a plastic bag revealed that it had been fractured at the distal section.No distal fragment was returned or contained in the plastic bag.The distal area of the actual sample was compared with that of a factory-retained sample of the same product code.It was confirmed that distal 70mm in length was missing.Reproductive testing was performed and a test sample with its distal part at approximately 70mm from the distal end being bent was subjected to consecutive one-way torque force.As a result, the test sample became fractured.Ifu states: if any resistance is felt or if the tip's behavior and/or location seems improper, stop manipulating the guide wire and/or endotherapy accessory and determine the cause by fluoroscopy or endoscope.Continuing to manipulate the guidewire could cause patient injury, such as punctures, hemorrhages or mucous membrane damage.It may also damage the endoscope, instrument and/or endotherapy accessory.Based on the provided information and investigation results, there is no definitive evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.It is likely that the actual sample was subjected to some external force and fractured.However, since the actual sample could not be subjected to close examination due to unknown infectiousness, the exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.
|