This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d10, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Product complaint (b)(4).This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary :according to the information provided, it was reported that the truespan blocked during the procedure.The handle remained stuck (see enclosed picture) and the implants weren't disposed.The complaint device was received and inspected.The implants and suture were received along with the needle.It was observed that the gun was jammed.Also, it was identified that the shaft of the gun was bent.To test its functionality, the trigger could not pull due to it was loose; there was no tension on the handle.The main pusher rod was not actioned; thus, the implants did not deploy.Therefore, the internal mechanism of the handle was not working as intended.The photo provided by the customer showed the same analysis findings.The possible root cause for the bent issue could be attribute when not inserting the needle to the proper depth for deployment, can causing damage in the gun and could have a failure being fired.Also, for the deployed failure reported could be related to a damage on internal component of the deploy mechanism.Finally, for the trigger loose can be related when applies to much force during deployment of the implants.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 5l82005, and no non-conformances were identified. at this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).
|