Initial reporter is synthes sales representative.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H3, h4, h6: part: 309.530; lot: 2072897; manufacturing site: bettlach; release to warehouse date: december 08, 2003.Due to the age of more than 17 years of the complained device, a wear or use related root cause is the most likely reason of the complained malfunction.Per franchise complaint product investigation procedure, for complaints for which a non-manufacturing related probable cause has been identified, no manufacturing record evaluation is required.Visual investigation: the conical extraction screw for large screws & 4.9mm bolts was received at us customer quality (cq).Visual inspection of the complaint device showed the tip threads are rounded and stripped.The condition of the device is consistent as an end of life indicator for the device.No other issues were identified during inspection.The received condition is consistent with the complaint condition thus the complaint is confirmed.Investigation conclusion: after a visual inspection per guidance, it is determined that the reusable instrument is worn from repeated use and servicing; therefore, further investigation for the reported complaint device is not required.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|