H3 and h6: an authorized philips field service engineer (fse) was at the customer site.Alarm log files were reviewed for the patient, who was located in bed "r.6a".It was found that the monitor for this bed (monitor 2) lost the connection to the central one at 20:32 on (b)(6) 2020, and only connected again on (b)(6) 2020 at 8:35; therefore, there was no central monitoring during the patient event.Alert / date / time bed / label action device name on (b)(6) 2020, 20:32; r.6a; device is offline; monitor2.On (b)(6) 2020, 8:35; r.6a; device is online; monitor2.The fse was able to verify that there was never any lack of awareness of the patient¿s condition or any delay in treatment; therefore, the event is not considered a serious injury.The fse installed the latest software both at the philips information center ix (pic ix) and on the monitors.In addition, the customer has ordered a new network switch, because it is suspected that the issue is due to a defective network switch.The reported malfunction was confirmed; there was an issue with data transmission, causing the affected bed to lose connection prior to the patient incident, and not being restored until after the incident.It was suspected that the network switch was defective.Submission of a report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, distributor, manufacturer, or product caused or contributed to the event.
|
H6: the serious injury was not a result of the philips device, therefore, the event is not considered a serious injury.The cause of the central station drop out was due to the network switch.Submission of a report does not constitute an admission that medical personnel, user facility, importer, distributor, manufacturer, or product caused or contributed to the event.
|