• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARTIVA, INC CARTIVA SCI; PROSTHESIS, METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT CARTILAGE REPLACEMENT IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARTIVA, INC CARTIVA SCI; PROSTHESIS, METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT CARTILAGE REPLACEMENT IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number CAR-10-US
Device Problem Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Synovitis (2094); Joint Swelling (2356)
Event Date 03/10/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned.Visual examination of the returned part appeared to have a partially torn portion on the articulating surface.The partial tearing of the implant is not representative of wear seen in the 5-year simulated wear of cartiva against cartilage.Since it was reported that the tearing could be seen in an mri before explanting, it is also not indicative of a removal technique such as rongeurs.This partially detached piece of the implant measured approximately 3.3mm in height and 2.4mm in width.Total device diameter was measured at an average of 10.7mm, which is within the diameter validation specification for a final, manufactured device.The height of the implant not containing this damaged portion measured at 9.5mm, which is within the validation specification for height of a final, manufactured device.The implant was weighed, resulting in a measurement of 0.8 grams, which is below the final, manufactured weight specification of 0.85g - 0.93g, indicating some mass loss.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the surgery the implant was left 2mm proud.Both ap and lateral x rays looked great.Week of february 3rd: patient reported some pain and experienced a minor infection from the sutures.Reported minor puss was discharged and the doctor placed the patient on an antibiotic, which cleared everything up quickly.3 weeks later the patient is doing well and range of motion (rom) is good approximately 7 weeks post-op the patient went to see the doctor because she was experiencing severe swelling, lost rom, and pain.Doctor assumed it was maybe pain associated with the tendon and ordered and mri asap.Mri revealed the implant was tearing.Approximately 8 weeks post-op doctor had to surgically go in and remove the cartiva and backfill with a bone void filler and antibiotics.Patient suffered significant synovitis.The implant was sent to pathology and images provided of the joint being exposed prior to removal.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARTIVA SCI
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT CARTILAGE REPLACEMENT IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARTIVA, INC
6120 windward parkway
suite 220
alpharetta, ga
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARTIVA, INC
6120 windward parkway
suite 220
alpharetta, ga
Manufacturer Contact
matthew parrish
1023 cherry rd
memphis, tn 
MDR Report Key10289924
MDR Text Key199840455
Report Number3009351194-2020-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PNW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150017
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberCAR-10-US
Device Catalogue NumberCAR-10-US
Device Lot NumberF030719001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/06/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/17/2020
Initial Date FDA Received07/17/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-