The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure bilateral pulmonary artery using a penumbra engine (engine) and penumbra engine canisters (canister).During the procedure, it was reported that multiple canisters would not seat properly on the engine.Therefore, the engine was removed.The procedure was completed using a new engine and the same canisters.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
Results: the engine pumps housing was not seated properly onto the base.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned engine confirmed that a demonstration canister was unable to seat properly on the engine.Further evaluation revealed that the engines housing was not seated properly onto its base.The engines housing was opened, and a screw port was found to be damaged.The root cause of these damages could not be determined; however, these damages likely contributed to the reported complaint.The engines housing was seated properly onto its base, and a demonstration canister was then able to be seated onto the engine.The engine was able to produce vacuum pressure within specification and all four vacuum indicator lights illuminated.Penumbra engines are inspected at incoming quality control which includes a visual inspection as well as a verification of test results to ensure specifications for each output are met.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Section h.Box 6.Conclusions code 1: 4316 - the investigation findings do not lead to a clear conclusion about the cause of the damaged housing that likely contributed to the reported complaint.
|