• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH; ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number M00545000
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/30/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(initial reporter city): (b)(6).(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was opened and used to diagnose a lower common bile duct stenosis in the lower common bile duct during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the physician found the tip of the brush would not extend from the catheter and that the outer sheath of the delivery shaft was damaged.The procedure was completed with another rx cytology brush.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to stable.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an rx cytology brush was opened and used to diagnose a lower common bile duct stenosis in the lower common bile duct during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6), 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the physician found the tip of the brush would not extend from the catheter and that the outer sheath of the delivery shaft was damaged.The procedure was completed with another rx cytology brush.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block e1 (initial reporter city): (b)(6) block h6: problem code 2907 captures the reportable event of working length detached/separated.Block h10: investigation results one rx cytology brush was received for analysis.Visual inspection of the returned device revealed that the working length (extrusion and pull wire) was kinked at the proximal section, approximately at 44cm and 45cm from the black heat shrink.However, no broken nor detached section were found along the device.Functional evaluation of the returned device found that when the handle was actuated, the brush did not extend.The handle was disassembled (the blue cap was unscrewed) and it was observed that the pull wire was kinked at the proximal end (the distal end of the handle cannula).This device condition could have generated the issues during brush extension.Therefore, the reported complaint of brush difficult to extend is confirmed.Based on all available information, boston scientific concludes that this device met all manufacturing requirements and no abnormalities were reported during the manufacturing process.During the visual assessment, it was found that the working length and the pull wire were kinked.As per complaint information the issue occurred during the procedure.It is most likely that the failures found were caused due to manipulation as the customer brushed back and forth during the procedure.Handling and manipulation of the device can lead to kink along the catheter.This condition can cause difficulties to extend the brush due to the resistance between the components at the kinked sections of the device.Force applied to the handle in order to extend the brush can result in kinks along the pull wire at the distal end of the handle cannula.Based on the information available and the analysis performed, the most probable root cause classification is adverse event related to procedure.However, a cause of no problem detected is assigned to the reported complaint issue of working length detachment of device or device component, since the returned device showed no evidence of either the alleged issue or any defect which could have contributed with this event.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and confirmed that this device met all material, assembly and performance specifications at the time of release for distribution.A labelling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.There were no issues found with the translation, wording, or graphics in the dfu.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPIC CYTOLOGY BRUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
MDR Report Key10320210
MDR Text Key200263968
Report Number3005099803-2020-02952
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729268628
UDI-Public08714729268628
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K930348
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/27/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2021
Device Model NumberM00545000
Device Catalogue Number4500
Device Lot Number0023422597
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/22/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/01/2020
Initial Date FDA Received07/24/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/05/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/27/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age66 YR
Patient Weight72
-
-