Device evaluation of monitor sn (b)(4) and electrode belt sn (b)(4) has been completed.The evaluation included review of downloaded software flag files on the day of the event and incoming functional testing.During the incoming functional testing, a 1hz simulated normal sinus rhythm signal was applied to the ecg electrodes, followed by a 5hz simulated treatable arrhythmia signal which verified proper performance of the detection algorithm.During the transition to the 5hz signal, the device was confirmed to properly enter into a treatment sequence which includes a verification of the tactile vibration alarm, audio messaging, and siren alarms, as well as a test of the pulse delivery circuitry.The pulse delivery circuitry test verified proper charging of the high voltage capacitors and proper delivery of five full energy 150j biphasic pulses.The functional testing confirmed proper response button functionality, ecg acquisition, detection algorithm performance, and pulse delivery functionality.There is no indication of a product malfunction.
|
A us distributor contacted zoll to report that a patient was appropriately treated on (b)(6) 2020.It was reported that the patient ended use on (b)(6) 2020, as their icd was able to be turned back on and they no longer needed the lifevest.The patient degraded to vt at 150 bpm at 02:25:12 on (b)(6) 2020. the lifevest delivered one appropriate treatment at 02:26:23 during vt at 160 bpm.The patient's post shock rhythm was svt at 150 bpm with pvc's.The lifevest delivered a second appropriate treatment at 2:30:59, while the patient was in vt at 160 bpm, but the treatment was unable to convert the arrhythmia. the post-shock rhythm was vt at 160 bpm.There is no indication of medical intervention.There is no indication of serious injury, death, or device malfunction.Reporting out of an abundance of caution as rhythm after post shock vt is not known.
|