• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TELEFLEX MEDICAL VISISTAT 35W 6/BOX; STAPLE, REMOVABLE (SKIN)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TELEFLEX MEDICAL VISISTAT 35W 6/BOX; STAPLE, REMOVABLE (SKIN) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 528235
Device Problem Failure to Form Staple (2579)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/05/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn# (b)(4).The device has not been returned for investigation.The device history review for the product visistat 35w 6/box lot #73c1900134 investigation did not show issues related to the complaint.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend related events.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the procedure, the customer found that after the third fired clip was not clipping properly there is a bent and reopening.The customer replaced the new product and ended the procedure.There is no adverse event and the patient was fine.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during the procedure, the customer found that after the third fired clip was not clipping properly there is a bent and reopening.The customer replaced the new product and ended the procedure.There is no adverse event and the patient was fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).Per dhr the product visistat 35w 6/box lot # 73c1900134 was manufactured on 03/06/2019 a total of (b)(4) pieces.Lot was released on 03/15/2019.Dhr investigation did not show issues related to complaint.The device has not been returned for investigation.The device history review for the product visistat 35w 6/box lot #73c1900134 investigation did not show issues related to the complaint.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend related events.An attempt to fire staples was made by engaging the trigger of the stapler using hand pressure.Upon engagement of the trigger, a staple was unable to form or close properly.This was repeated two times with the same result.The stapler was disassembled and it was confirmed to have been assembled correctly.A functioning lab inventory visistat stapler was disassembled and the forming tool from the returned sample was inserted into the lab inventory stapler.The stapler was reassembled and the trigger was engaged.Three staples were able to properly form and release from the device.The forming tool from the functioning lab inventory stapler was inserted into the returned sample.Upon engagement of the trigger, the staple was unable to form properly.Next, the anvil component was tested.The anvil from the returned sample was inserted into the lab inventory stapler.The stapler was reassembled and the trigger was engaged.Three staples were tested and all were unable to form properly.The anvil from the functioning lab inventory stapler was inserted into the returned sample.Upon engagement of the trigger, three staples were able to properly form and release from the device.The sample anvil appears to be preventing the staples from forming properly.Further examination revealed that the sample anvil was a regular size anvil for visistat 35 r staplers.Upon investigation, it was observed that the staples were not forming or closing since the incorrect anvil was assembled into the returned sample.When a visistat 35 w anvil was inserted into the stapler, the stapler fired properly.Nc 60052030 was initiated in order to implement corrective actions to prevent this issue from recurring in the future.The ifu for this product, l02644, was reviewed as a part of this complaint investigation.The ifu states "to obtain optimum staple c losure, the trigger must be squeezed all the way in." a nonconformance has been initiated by the manufacturing site to implement corrective actions in order to prevent this issue from re curring in the future.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend on complaints of this nature.The reported complaint of "misfire/jam-staples not forming/closing" was confirmed based upon the sample received.Upon functional inspection, the staples were unable to form properly.It was found that the stapler was assembled with a visistat 35r anvil instead of a visistat 35w anvil.When the stapler was assembled with the correct 35w anvil, the stapler fired properly.A nonconformance was initiated at the manufacturing site in order to implement corrective actions to prevent this issue from recurring in the future.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend on complaints of this nature.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VISISTAT 35W 6/BOX
Type of Device
STAPLE, REMOVABLE (SKIN)
Manufacturer (Section D)
TELEFLEX MEDICAL
morrisville NC
MDR Report Key10326564
MDR Text Key200427568
Report Number3003898360-2020-00607
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GDT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/20/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/05/2024
Device Catalogue Number528235
Device Lot Number73C1900134
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/10/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/20/2020
Initial Date FDA Received07/27/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/09/2020
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/09/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-