The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.It was reported the device was not used past its expiry.Initial reporter state: (b)(6).(b)(4).The complainant indicated that the device was disposed and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a percuflex urinary diversion stent was used in an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, during the procedure, withdrawal/closure of the procedure, the stent was broken about 15 cm from the pigtail.Reportedly, the broken stent was removed and there were no fragments of the percuflex urinary diversion stent left inside the patient.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
|