(b)(4).Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received submerged in an unknown solution inside a specimen cup.Additionally, a shipping label was received as well.Visual inspection under magnification revealed a detached haptic and that the lens was received cut in half, which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.Dimensional inspection was performed (haptic width and haptic thickness on the remaining haptic), and all measurements were within specifications.Based on the return condition of the lens no further evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and revealed that the product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no other complaints were received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) rotated 30 degrees and was noted to manifest as decreased visual acuity.Therefore, the iol was explanted from the patient¿s right eye.It was replaced with a different model iol, 21.5 diopter power.There was no incision enlargement, no vitrectomy, or no sutures required.There was no patient injury post-op.No other information was provided.
|