(b)(4).This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: b4, b5, d10, d11, g4, g7, h1, h2, h3, h6, h10 d11: item 150493 lot 254670, item 150476 lot 510930, item 150480 lot 745700, item 11-150822 lot 961580, item 161043 lot 826550, item 150477 lot 170160, item 150478 lot 979820, item 150466 lot 012560, item 150446 lot 517770.Visual examination of the returned bearing found signs of being implanted wear/discoloration and is fractured.Device was submitted for further analysis.Analysis determined the articular surface fracture was potentially caused by gradual penetration of the yoke into the material due to pulling forces in extension, followed by subsequent fracture due to potential overloading and the reduced bearing material and possibly exacerbated by m/l misalignment resulting in keyway impingement, overloading, and abrasion wear on one side.Review of the device history record(s) identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.X-rays were provided and reviewed by a health care professional.Review found sharply marginated hypodense object within the posterior knee joint and a joint effusion.This most likely represents a displaced polyethylene implant.Bone quality appears osteopenic.Patient anatomy appears unremarkable.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|