This report was initially submitted following a canadian customer notification of the misidentification of a mold isolate as candida orthopilosis in association with the vitek® ms instrument - reference (b)(4), serial number (b)(6).An internal biomérieux investigation was performed by analyzing the customer¿s provided data.Fine tuning: the vilink® alert tool criteria monitoring is only based on number of ¿all peaks¿ and number of ¿good peaks¿.The previous fine-tuning was not conform.Therefore, the vilink tool cannot be used to determine if fine-tuning was needed at the time of the testing.Spot preparation: sample and calibrator ¿all peaks¿ values are heterogeneous.However, the customer followed the vitek ms mould protocol.The final sample put on the slide is a liquid.Since the customer was using liquid deposit, the spots from the customer must have been homogenous.Organism identification: the expected identification is unknown.The identification has to be confirmed with a reference method (sequencing).According to data provided, the misidentification result was obtained from the spectra having a low number of peaks (31), which is near the acceptable limit for giving an ¿identification¿ result or a ¿no identification¿ result (30).Reprocessing of the customer data with the existing knowledge base (kb) does not reproduce the customer¿s misidentification result.Purpureocillium lilacinum is obtained with vitek ms kb 3.2 and the new kb under development.Purpureocillium lilacinum is a species of filamentous fungus and could be concordant with the macroscopic aspect of the mold strain.The reprocessing of the customer data with the existing kb did not reproduce the misidentification.The investigation found no root cause indicating that there was a malfunction of the system.
|