• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMÉRIEUX, SA VITEK MS INSTRUMENT; VITEK® MS INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMÉRIEUX, SA VITEK MS INSTRUMENT; VITEK® MS INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 410895
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer in the united states notified biomérieux of obtaining misidentifications during mould negative quality control testing with the vitek® ms instrument (ref.410895, serial number (b)(4)).The customer reported four failed vitek® ms mould runs in which the positive control was conform but the negative control (matrix alone with no microorganism) gave an erroneous identification instead of no identification.The identifications for the negative control given by vitek ms were: low discrimination as mucor circinelloides / microsporum gypseum / sarcladium kiliense.Single choice as saksenaea erythrospora.Single choice as microsporum gypseum.Single choice as trichophyton violaceum.There is no patient associated with this qc testing; therefore, there is no adverse event related to any patient's state of health.A biomérieux internal investigation has been completed with the following results: fine tuning: the status was good at the time of acquisition but the level of resolution and s/n were very high which can generate interfering peaks.Monitoring of the fine tuning status with vilink alert tool is useful only if all mandatory fine tuning criteria have been met.In this case, fine tuning was not conform, and it could have had an impact on the vitek ms performances.Vilink alert tool criteria monitoring is only based on the number of ¿all peaks¿ and number of ¿good peaks¿.Spot preparation quality -the customer¿s spot preparation quality was not optimal.The sample ¿all peaks¿ values were quite heterogeneous.However, this root cause will be not retained as a cause of the identification issue because for this case, the customer followed the vitek ms mould protocol.The final sample deposit was liquid and all spots should be homogenous.Sample data analysis -according to data provided, the misidentification results were obtained from the spectra having the lower number of peaks (between 22 and 33) which is near the acceptable limit for giving an ¿identification¿ result or a ¿no identification¿ result (20 peaks for fungi).In addition, the misidentification was obtained with a low identification score (between -0.39 and ¿ 0.15) which is near the acceptable limit for giving an ¿identification¿ result or a ¿no identification¿ result (-0.40).For these four (4) negative control spectra, the resolution values were very low (between 3 and 80) in comparison of the four (4) positive control spectra (between 677 and 792).The s/n values were very low (between 0 and 1) in comparison of the 4 positive control spectra (between 39 and 161).According to this data, the quality of negative control spectra was very bad and misid could be explain by the present of interfering peaks.When the small peaks threshold level was increased (at 15mv instead of 0 mv), "no identification" results were obtained and there was no longer a misidentification.These results could be explained by the presence of an important level of interfering peaks and confirm that the fine tuning was not optimal.Root cause analysis: fine tuning did not conform.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK MS INSTRUMENT
Type of Device
VITEK® MS INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMÉRIEUX, SA
3 route de port michaud
la balme 38390
FR  38390
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMÉRIEUX, SA
3 route de port michaud
la balme 38390
FR   38390
Manufacturer Contact
danielle cooper
595 anglum road
hazelwood, MO 63042
MDR Report Key10496854
MDR Text Key230511277
Report Number9615754-2020-00145
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QBN
UDI-Device Identifier03573026359119
UDI-Public03573026359119
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K181412
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/04/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number410895
Device Catalogue Number410895
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/05/2020
Initial Date FDA Received09/04/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-