|
Model Number 90338 |
Device Problem
Component Missing (2306)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/14/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device is not available to the manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the procedure for m1 occlusion, subject microcatheter was used to facilitate retriever to target occlusion.Physician had successful first pass using subject microcatheter and retriever.Upon second pass, physician noted that distal r/o marker for the subject catheter was not visible.The distal marker was no present upon physician inspection and was confirmed under fluoroscopy that the marker was not within patient body.The physician continued the procedure and patient had full revascularization as the procedure was completed successfully.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the procedure for m1 occlusion, subject microcatheter was used to facilitate retriever to target occlusion.Physician had successful first pass using subject microcatheter and retriever.Upon second pass, physician noted that distal r/o marker for the subject catheter was not visible.The distal marker was no present upon physician inspection and was confirmed under fluoroscopy that the marker was not within patient body.The physician continued the procedure and patient had full revascularization as the procedure was completed successfully.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the results of the dhr review, there is no indication that the device, labeling or packaging failed to meet its specifications when released.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.As per the available information the patients tortuosity was above average.The device was not returned.It is probable that the device was damaged during the clinical procedure causing the reported event.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to this complaint as the issue is associated with a product that meets stryker design and manufacture specifications and was used in according with the dfu but due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use, the product performance was limited.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|