• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ANGIOJET; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ANGIOJET; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bradycardia (1751); Hematoma (1884); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Renal Failure (2041); Injury (2348); Hematuria (2558)
Event Date 05/05/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pouncey al et al., angiojet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and catheter directed thrombolysis vs.Catheter directed thrombolysis alone for the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: a single centre retrospective cohort study, european journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Ejvs.2020.05.006, pp.1-8.Date of event was approximated using date of article acceptance.
 
Event Description
It was reported via journal article that patient complications occurred.Data was reviewed to examine the outcomes of patients treated with additional angiojet zelantedvt pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (pcdt) vs.Catheter directed lysis (cdt) alone.Vascular access was obtained via the popliteal vein, which was performed under direct ultrasound guided puncture.Access guidewires were placed into the inferior vena cava using standard techniques.Angiojet was either performed with initial powerpulse followed by aspiration mode, if performed during the primary procedure, or in aspiration mode if following on from a previous period of cdt.If a clear obstructive lesion or obvious residual chronic disease was identified, this was treated by balloon venoplasty and stent placement.The technique of balloon venoplasty and stent placement followed standard methodology.Anticoagulation was monitored during the index procedure with measures of intraprocedural activated clotting time (act) following cessation of lytic therapy and appropriate dosing with intravenous heparin to maintain an act of >250 s.Intermittent pneumatic compression (ipc) was applied from the start of lysis and maintained post procedure until discharge.Following completion of lysis, all access catheters were removed in the treatment room and compression stockings were applied in addition to ipc.Therapeutic low molecular weight heparin (lmwh) was commenced within one hour of procedure completion.Patients received two weeks of therapeutic lmwh with transition to oral anticoagulation therapy following a surveillance duplex at two weeks.Complications of post-thrombotic syndrome, hemoglobinuria, acute kidney injury, epistaxis, hematoma, transient bradycardia and minor allergic reaction (classified as the presence of a rash) occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANGIOJET
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
500 commander shea boulevard
quincy MA 02171
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key10547776
MDR Text Key207358152
Report Number2134265-2020-12844
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/02/2020
Initial Date FDA Received09/17/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-