• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD INLAY OPTIMA URETERAL STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD INLAY OPTIMA URETERAL STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 788626
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problems Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 08/29/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that optima weren't able to remove after implant into patient for 3 month.Patient was required to go back to operation room under general anesthesia to remove optima instead of local anesthesia.Per additional information received via mail from ibc on 17 sep 2020, optima was removed using endoscope.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event was confirmed.A ureteral stent was returned opened without its original packaging.The sample was found to be deformed with hard pebble-like of material found.The hardened parts of the stent was found to be embedded with the pebble like material.The photo samples returned from the customer shows the stent immediately after it was removed from the patient.The photo samples shows damage and calcification on the stent in multiple locations.The cause of the removal issue appears to be the device calcification.As the device was used and removed via a surgery a new complaint will not be opened for the damaged stent.A potential root cause of the calcification issue could be due to " material selection¿.The lot number was unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "ureteral stents should be checked periodically for signs of encrustation and proper function.Periodic checks of the stent by cystoscopic and/or radiographic procedures are recommended at intervals deemed to be appropriate by the physician in consideration of the individual patient¿s condition and other patient specific factors".H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that optima weren't able to remove after implant into patient for 3 month.Patient was required to go back to operation room under general anesthesia to remove optima instead of local anesthesia.Per additional information received via mail from ibc on (b)(6) 2020, optima was removed using endoscope.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARD INLAY OPTIMA URETERAL STENT
Type of Device
URETERAL STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington GA 30014
MDR Report Key10560395
MDR Text Key207733332
Report Number1018233-2020-06088
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00801741015762
UDI-Public(01)00801741015762
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K043193
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/21/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number788626
Device Catalogue Number788626
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/18/2020
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/30/2020
Initial Date FDA Received09/21/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/04/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/21/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-