• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND IN.PACT ADMIRAL PACLITAXEL-ELUTING PTA BALLOON CATHETER; DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND IN.PACT ADMIRAL PACLITAXEL-ELUTING PTA BALLOON CATHETER; DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY CATHETER Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Occlusion (1984)
Event Date 11/12/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Journal title: a retrospective comparison analysis of results of drug-coated balloon versus plain balloon angioplasty in treatment of juxta-anastomotic de novo stenosis of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas journal: the journal of vascular access year: 2020 ref: doi: 10.1177/1129729819893205.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
This journal article was published to report a retrospective analysis of 80 patients with a juxta-anastomotic stenosis of distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula between january 2016 and september 2017.Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of treatment as drug-coated balloon ¿ percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 44) and plain balloon ¿ percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 43).Intra- and post-procedural data were recorded.Both groups had mature fistulas, and the mean age of fistula was 11.3 ± 9.1 months in the drug-coated balloon ¿ percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group and 10.3 ± 8.8 months in the plain balloon ¿ percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group.A non-medtronic balloon was used for the plain balloon group and in.Pact admiral was used as the dcb of choice for the treatment of the dcb group.Acetylsalicylic acid (100 mg/day) was prescribed in both gro ups after the procedure.Routine follow-up was performed with cdus at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and target lesion primary patency (tlpp) was evaluated.There was no significant difference in the target lesion stenosis rate and the median lesion length between the groups.Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient groups are shown in table 1.Technical and clinical success were achieved in both groups.Although tlpp was similar at 6 months between the groups (93.1% vs 81.3%, respectively; p = 0.14), the dcb-pta group had significantly higher rates at 12 months (81.8% vs 51.1%, respectively; p = 0.01) (table 2).During follow-up, 8 patients in the dcb-pta group and 21 patients in the pb-pta group required reintervention due to target lesion-related stenosis.The kaplan¿meier plot showed a statistically significant difference in the tlpp rates between the group.No further injury is reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IN.PACT ADMIRAL PACLITAXEL-ELUTING PTA BALLOON CATHETER
Type of Device
DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
IE 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
IE  
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
IE  
091708734
MDR Report Key10573392
MDR Text Key208130113
Report Number9612164-2020-03575
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ONU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTU
PMA/PMN Number
P140010
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/23/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/15/2020
Initial Date FDA Received09/23/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age56 YR
-
-