Occupation: reporter is a synthes employee.The device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported that on an unknown date, during a routine incoming inspection of a loaner set at the field service location, it was observed that the termite forceps was broken.There was no patient or hospital involvement.This report involves one (1) termite forceps 90mm.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Investigation summary: visual inspection: the termite forceps 90mm (part#: 398.95.96, lot#: a7pa29) was received at us customer quality (cq).It is observed that the tips of the forceps were deformed.The remaining portions of the device shows normal wear which would not contribute to the complaint condition.This complaint can be confirmed.Conclusion: after a visual inspection per guidance provided in windchill document#: (b)(4), it is determined that the reusable instrument is worn from repeated use and servicing; therefore, further investigation for the reported complaint device is not required.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition; therefore, further corrective and / or preventive action is not required.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: part number: 398.95.96, lot number: a7pa29, manufacturing site: tuttlingen, release to warehouse date: week 29, 2006.A review of the device history records is not possible, the dhr is no longer available due to the age of the instrument.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|