Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Burst Container or Vessel (1074); Noise, Audible (3273)
|
Patient Problems
Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 07/31/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The device was not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the nurse was irrigating through the urinary drainage bag port, both the patient and the nurse heard a faint ¿pop¿.It was then determined that the catheter balloon had broken.Per additional information received from the complainant on 17sep2020 via email, the device was used on a (b)(6)-year-old female.The irrigation of the device was through the urinary drainage sampling port.The patient was sent to the operation room to determine whether there were any missing pieces of the balloon retained.Per the complainant, that could not be determined.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event was inconclusive.No sample was returned for evaluation.A potential root cause for this failure could be "non-uniform thin sac and /or finish dip coverage." the lot number was unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.Unable to perform labelling review due to unknown product code.Although the product family was unknown, the silicone catheter product ifus were found to be adequate based on past reviews.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the nurse was irrigating through the urinary drainage bag port, both the patient and the nurse heard a faint ¿pop¿.It was then determined that the catheter balloon had broken.Per additional information received from the complainant on 17sep2020 via email, the device was used on a thirteen-year-old female.The irrigation of the device was through the urinary drainage sampling port.The patient was sent to the operation room to determine whether there were any missing pieces of the balloon retained.Per the complainant, that could not be determined.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|